Finally!
A judge that can interpret the constitution and figure out that ID is not science.
Judge rules against ‘intelligent design’ in science class: “We have concluded that it is not [science], and moreover that ID cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents,’”
This should create precedent for similar rulings in other states.
Let me make something clear. I am not some sort of anti-religious zealot zealot, I have no problem with Belief in God, I just don’t think it should be taught in a science class. I think it blurs, or redefines as Kansas did, the definition of science, and gives our students a disadvantage in the future. How can you properly study science, if all of the sudden the scientific method turned into some blurry concept.